London, 23 July 2026: With Andy Burnham now in office as Prime Minister and confirmation that Torsten Bell will remain as Pensions Minister, pension savers and the industry are waiting to see whether former commitments survive the harsh reality of governing. PensionBee, a leading retirement savings provider, has set out five questions it believes the new leader must address in his first months in Downing Street.
1. Will the triple lock survive until the end of Parliament?
Andy Burnham has repeatedly recommitted to the State Pension triple lock, but reports suggest his own economic advisers view scrapping it as a straightforward way to repair the public finances. With the State Pension already costing around 5% of GDP (£138bn, second only to spending on the NHS), the Office for Budget Responsibility is projecting the policy itself will cost £15.5bn a year by 2029-30. The question is not whether reform is on the table, but whether the government reaches for one of the "middle way" options already proposed by industry figures rather than an outright manifesto U-turn. Changes here have consequences that echo across the generations and with the current economic difficulties faced by younger workers and those seeking work, the intergenerational impact arguments surrounding both keeping and dispensing with the triple lock will keep this issue at the forefront of policy debate.
Political risk factor: high
Financial implications: high
2. What will the government do with the Second Pensions Commission's findings?
The Commission's interim report warned that 15 million working-age people are not saving enough for retirement, with millions saving nothing at all. Its final report isn't due until early 2027, but with the industry pressing for a path to see Auto-Enrolment minimum contributions to rise from 8% to 12%, the new Prime Minister will face early pressure to signal his intentions on adequacy reform. Reforms to bring self-employed people and other ‘invisible workers’ into automatic pension saving and to address the structural barriers to pension adequacy faced by low earners, disabled people and those young people who are ‘NEET’ would send a strong signal that the new government is prepared to solve these difficult and so far unaddressed imbalances that only look set to grow. These could include removing the £10,000 Auto-Enrolment trigger and lowering the minimum age from 22 to 18.
Political risk factor: low
Financial implications: high
3. Will the Mansion House Accord turn from a promise into a reality?
The commitment for signatory DC funds to allocate at least 10% of main default funds to private markets by 2030 remains, with half of this to be directed towards UK private markets, is for now a voluntary industry commitment rather than a legal requirement. The Pension Schemes Act includes a reserve power allowing government to mandate this allocation across master trusts and Group Personal Pensions, but it was heavily constrained during its passage through Parliament: it can only be used once and not before 2028, falls away entirely by the end of 2035, is capped to the targets set out in the Accord, and includes a carve-out allowing trustees to seek exemption where they conclude the mandated investment isn't in members' best interests. Whether this government treats that power as a genuine backstop of last resort, or comes under pressure to use it as leverage if voluntary progress on the Accord stalls, will be an early test of how it weighs pension savers' protection against its wider growth agenda.
Political risk factor: medium
Financial implications: high
4. Will pension tax relief reform be back on the table?
Flat-rate pension tax relief has resurfaced at almost every fiscal event of the last decade. With limited room to raise income tax, NI or VAT and pressure mounting on the public finances, reform of higher rate relief remains one of the few significant revenue levers available to new Chancellor John Healey and is arguably one that risks less backlash when compared with other pension tax regime alterations. However, such a change would likely receive significant pushback given further disruption to long-term saving habits set against a backdrop of a nation of millions who already aren’t saving enough. A transition from the current system to a flat rate would also be administratively highly complex, at a time where the pensions industry is already grappling with looming changes to Inheritance Tax (bringing unused pension pots into IHT calculations from April 2027).
Political risk factor: medium
Financial implications: medium
5. Will Pensions Dashboards actually reach savers on schedule?
Scheme connection to the dashboards ecosystem remains legally required by 31 October 2026, with coverage now over 85%. But the public launch date has already slipped repeatedly, and the Money and Pensions Service has indicated the MoneyHelper dashboard is unlikely to be available to consumers before the 2027/28 financial year. After a decade of delay, the new government will need to commit to a firm public launch date, or risk the timetable drifting again.
Political risk factor: low
Financial implications: low
Becky O'Connor, Head of Pensions at PensionBee, said: “Andy Burnham has come in with a stated aim of a 10-year plan, signalling a willingness to think long term. Pension policy may therefore present a natural focus. Pensions are a highly politically sensitive topic - with policy decisions having a significant impact for the Treasury and for the nation both now and for generations to come.
“Balancing considerations of fairness, sustainability and the central goal of better long term financial security for all requires an effort to resolve existing tensions with honesty and creativity. Where there’s a will, there’s a way and there may be more tools in the new leader’s box that have not been sufficiently explored by his predecessors. Making pensions more equitable for those who are structurally disadvantaged by the current system, such as self-employed and disabled people, feels like a natural priority fit for the new Prime Minister.
“The Pension Schemes Act is the UK's most significant pensions shake-up in decades, and there are a plethora of key reforms and consultations already in motion as set out in the new ‘Roadmap’, so the continuity of leadership within the DWP is welcome. Given the extreme amount of changes to the pensions tax regime over recent years, taking a cautious approach and resisting the temptation to make further drastic alterations to the way pensions are taxed, without careful consideration of the impact for savers now and in the future, may be a wise approach.”
%201.png){kind=small}